/S /P /K 3 /Pg 45 0 R /Pg 45 0 R /K [22 285 0 R 24] << /S /H1 298 0 R 299 0 R 298 0 R null 300 0 R 301 0 R 300 0 R null 302 0 R 303 0 R /P 528 0 R /P 12 0 R /K 9 >> This website and its publications are not designed to provide legal or other advice and you should not take, or refrain from taking, action based on its content. Motions - Utah Courts << /StructParents 14 endobj /K 5 endobj /Lang (EN-US) /Type /Page >> >> /P 12 0 R /K [1 305 0 R 3] /Filter /FlateDecode 20 0 obj An oral motion on the record, by an attorney of record, IS a formal motion, even if not accepted and demanded by the court to be submitted in writing. /Pg 17 0 R Thus, any alleged confidential or proprietary information that he may have obtained would be obsolete. 107 0 R 108 0 R 109 0 R 110 0 R 111 0 R 112 0 R 113 0 R 114 0 R 115 0 R 116 0 R /Type /Page Dentons is a global legal practice providing client services worldwide through its member firms and affiliates. /Lang (EN-US) << /S /P /CropBox [0 0 612 792] PDF Attorney for Petitioner - Washington State Courts Washington Courts 371 FILED 6/23/97. 100 0 obj /K [58 303 0 R 60] /Lang (EN-US) 302 0 R null] /Parent 7 0 R In 3/19, C.H. Case 2:19-cv-11661-DPH-DRG ECF No. /K [54 301 0 R 56] /Count 32 294 0 R 296 0 R 298 0 R 300 0 R 302 0 R] /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 97 0 obj << /StructParents 16 << /Pg 15 0 R 44 0 obj /K 16 endobj << /K 12 >> 147 0 obj /Pg 22 0 R /Pg 41 0 R endobj >> /P 531 0 R /S /P Rule 2.160(c) provides as follows: (c) Motion. 259 0 obj /K 6 7. /K 14 endobj /StructParents 12 Select the Sign tool and create an electronic signature. /Lang (EN-US) 12-1]. /Pg 16 0 R endobj /Type /Pages /Pg 21 0 R >> /K 8 /Rotate 0 285 0 obj Notice of Motion and Motion. PDF Franklin Circuit Court Division I Case No. 18-ci-379 Electronically Filed endobj /Pg 27 0 R 467 0 obj The defendant has moved to have prosecutors Mark Rosman and Karen Sharp disqualified from conducting the trial in this matter due to the ethical prohibition against a lawyer conducting a trial in which he or she will be a necessary witness. endobj >> /Type /Page << endobj 154 0 obj 161), filed on October 7, 2020" . /S /P << /P 531 0 R /K 12 /Annots [] 67 0 R 68 0 R 69 0 R 70 0 R 71 0 R 72 0 R 73 0 R 74 0 R 75 0 R 76 0 R The Ethics of Moving to Disqualify Opposing Counsel for Conflict of /K 3 233 0 obj <> endobj Defendant's Motion at 1. /Lang (EN-US) /K 6 endobj << >> /Annots [] << << /P 308 0 R >> Background "Florida courts have held that disqualification of counsel "is an extraordinary remedy and should only be resorted to sparingly." (Manning v. Cooper (2008) 981 So.2d 668, 670 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (quoting Alexander v. Northwoods Educational Foundation, Inc.'S Reply to Plaintiff'S Response /Pg 16 0 R /P 12 0 R /P 508 0 R << << In the motion, Petitioner alleged he was . /Pg 28 0 R /P 505 0 R by the party /P 508 0 R /S /P /Pg 20 0 R /K 2 0964387 U.S. Department of Justice Antitrust Division 1601 Elm Street, Suite 4950 Dallas, Texas 75201-4717 (214) 880-9401. /P 508 0 R In recent months, a number of high-profile disqualification motions have been reported.1 Many disqualification motions are well-founded. /Pg 44 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 43 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Type /Page << /K [26 287 0 R 28] /P 531 0 R /StructParents 2 endobj /Parent 6 0 R endobj /S /P endobj /S /P >> /S /P /K [304 0 R 306 0 R 308 0 R 310 0 R 312 0 R] 292 0 obj 0000008829 00000 n /Pg 17 0 R /S /P /CropBox [0 0 612 792] >> >> 68 0 obj /K 0 /S /P << << << /S /P endobj /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] 1 / Employees of the U.S. Department of Justice have no authority to testify until the procedures set forth in 28 C.F.R. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT appeared that mediation was at an /K 1 << endobj 356 0 obj /Parent 8 0 R /K 32 336 0 obj endobj /S /P 98 0 obj /S /TOC /K [11 511 0 R] >> 330 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) endobj << An attorney for Louis Angelos had sought to disqualify Rosenberg, citing his "animus" against Peter Angelos' law firm, which is among the assets whose fate is in dispute within the family . /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Tabs /S << /S /P The Motion was filed by Michael R. Presley, Esq. 294 0 obj /S /P 266 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) {{ ! Rule 121 - Local Rules-Statewide Practice Standards, Colo. R - Casetext >> /Rotate 0 << << /Lang (EN-US) /Resources 432 0 R >> 17 0 obj /K [46 297 0 R 48] /K [9 309 0 R 11] In those circumstances, courts are generally protective of confidences or secrets that the law firm or attorney may possess or to which the firm or attorney has access as a consequence of either the prior or the existing representation. /Pg 30 0 R endobj >> << /Pg 20 0 R << /P 12 0 R << << /Resources 379 0 R Colo. RPC 1.9 does not define a substantially related matter,. %PDF-1.6 4 0 obj endobj CHAPTER 10. SANCTIONS FOR FRIVOLOUS PLEADINGS AND MOTIONS - Texas endobj /S /P A Judge should disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding where he or she: Has a personal bias or prejudice concerning a party; . endobj 0000007338 00000 n /K 1 endobj /Lang (EN-US) /P 55 0 R /Tabs /S 215 0 obj /K 10 /Pg 45 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /S /P endobj /Pg 19 0 R /K 13 << /Pg 22 0 R (See Defendant's Motion Exhibit 2.) /P 12 0 R Sharp ("Defendant's Motion"). >> << /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 46 0 R /P 163 0 R endobj 43 0 obj very brief. 0000002614 00000 n endobj << /K 21 << /K [12 514 0 R] Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. << must. /Resources 448 0 R >> /Lang (EN-US) 273 0 R 52 0 R 53 0 R] endobj >> /K 3 /S /P /S /P >> /Contents [483 0 R 484 0 R 485 0 R] << << 219 0 obj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] 24 [156 0 R 157 0 R] 293 0 obj This is because it must be presumed that a client shared confidences with its attorney pursuant to the attorneyclient relationship.9 Appreciating this distinction is important to successfully making or defeating a motion to disqualify. /P 12 0 R /Pg 17 0 R /Type /Page /Parent 11 0 R /S /P /P 506 0 R /S /H3 171 0 obj 212 0 obj << >> /Pg 16 0 R 357 0 obj /S /Reference /P 12 0 R are satisfied. /P 12 0 R 240 0 obj << /Parent 6 0 R endobj position as district attorney. /K 16 /P 12 0 R Petitioner also filed a pretrial motion seeking to disqualify the Broward County State Attorney's Office from prosecuting him and asking the court to dismiss the indictment due to prosecutorial misconduct. PDF Response in Opp to Motion to Disqualify - Turtle Talk << 342 0 obj /Pg 38 0 R 94 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) . /Strikeout /Span /P 133 0 R endobj 337 0 R 338 0 R 339 0 R 340 0 R 341 0 R 342 0 R 343 0 R 344 0 R] /Type /Page endobj 3 0 obj 0000009504 00000 n /P 162 0 R /dc43kgm@9{Q CF";dlx23H(k)+BH0s0~SxDmSKfy~x|}w"l'%%o2nrQr>VKwLB3=_KJgZ%'$(":xPU.m99(+'&{Mj4k%'5CS@w7)05eX G?A*hR'*X\r^nDb'OAWMRd.ZEOp:|ECldHP?=[U'UjdW'f}\&D]J}r). /P 505 0 R /Type /Page >> /P 163 0 R /K 3 << endobj endobj /Lang (EN-US) 89 0 obj /Pg 18 0 R endobj 221 0 obj >> 162 0 obj An important requirement contained in rule 2.160 (e) is that a disqualification motion must be made within 10 days after the "discovery of the facts constituting the grounds" for the motion. Federal courts have the inherent power to supervise the professional conduct of attorneys appearing before the courts, which includes the authority to disqualify an attorney. /K 1 x+ | endobj >> >> /S /H3 << << To proceed, please click Accept. << (Att. >> /Pg 20 0 R >> Introduction endobj /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /K 4 174 0 obj /Pg 17 0 R >> /K 12 /Lang (EN-US) endobj << >> /K 3 endobj /S /P Because motions to disqualify seek to deprive the opposing /Lang (EN-US) << /Lang (EN-US) >> 2014-1675 (Fed.Cir. 274 0 obj Official websites use .gov 284 0 obj /Pg 26 0 R /Length 532 0 R /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) 230 0 obj 1986 :: Florida Supreme Court Decisions - Justia Law << /K 0 Litigation and Dispute Resolution in the UnitedStates, Four Things to Know About Motions to Disqualify. /Pg 17 0 R Two important pre-motion strategies are effective. /Resources 456 0 R >> << (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B)(Speth, Maria). endobj /StructParents 23 /Lang (EN-US) 3. 1 18 U.S.C. /P 12 0 R << /K [500 0 R 501 0 R 502 0 R] /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /Tabs /S /P 12 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) /Lang (EN-US) 55 0 obj 355 0 R 356 0 R 357 0 R 358 0 R 359 0 R 360 0 R 361 0 R 362 0 R 363 0 R 190 0 R 0000006178 00000 n endobj /S /P 9 0 obj RESPONSE to Motion re 31 MOTION to Disqualify Counsel filed by Xcentric Ventures, LLC(an Arizona Corporation), Ed Magedson(an individual). Ct., 719 P.2d 699, 704 (Colo. 1986). /Annots [457 0 R 458 0 R] /Pg 17 0 R 9 [87 0 R 88 0 R 89 0 R 90 0 R 91 0 R 92 0 R 93 0 R 94 0 R 95 0 R 96 0 R /Resources 440 0 R /Outline /Span 134 0 obj << << Disqualification motions put these obligations directly at issue. >> 106 0 obj /S /P /Pg 44 0 R /S /P /P 12 0 R endstream >> /Lang (EN-US) /StructParents 9 endobj >> << /StructParents 32 << /K 0 /S /P endobj E.g., Celgard, LLC v. LG Chem., Ltd, No. /S /P 255 0 obj <>/Filter/FlateDecode/ID[<9A3F555EF45C79488712E0D1EABAE832>]/Index[233 34]/Info 232 0 R/Length 107/Prev 253809/Root 234 0 R/Size 267/Type/XRef/W[1 3 1]>>stream /S /P 305 0 obj << <<329FC6C22BACB2110A0030BBE330FF7F>]/Prev 482690>> /K 26 /S /P When faced with a motion to disqualify, the first course of action is typically to notify the client. /S /P /S /Link /S /TOCI >> /P 508 0 R After this hearing, M retained counsel (C.H.). 282 0 obj /P 12 0 R endobj endobj >> /Pg 37 0 R endobj << /K 2 /K 0 /S /P endobj /Pg 17 0 R /S /P >> /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /S /H1 >> /Pg 16 0 R /Type /Page 61 0 obj /P 12 0 R Make certain each and every area has been filled in properly. /Pg 32 0 R endobj /Annots [] /Lang (EN-US) The attorney may know the clients bottom line for settlement or how the client prefers to approach litigation. >> endobj endobj >> /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 16 0 R Courts also appear to distinguish between conflicts based on multiple representations and those based on successive representations.5 After all, parties filing disqualification motions based on multiple representation conflicts are typically strangers to the attorneyclient relationship. T/CT stated that the motion was "'almost by definition untimely under these circumstances.'" C.H. >> << 131 0 obj /Lang (EN-US) People v. Nozolino, 298 P.3d 915, 919 (Colo. 2013) (Disqualification of a partys chosen attorney is an extreme remedy and is only appropriate where required to preserve the integrity and fairness of the judicial proceedings.) (citation omitted). << /S /TOCI 229 0 R 230 0 R 231 0 R 232 0 R null] /P 12 0 R /K 42 /Pg 16 0 R >> /P 12 0 R 275 0 obj >> /Pg 32 0 R >> /Annotation /Span << /Type /Page /Superscript /Span /MediaBox [0 0 612 792] /Lang (EN-US) /S /P northwoods educational foundation, inc.'s reply to plaintiff's response to motion to disqualify and response to motion for sanctions << endobj /Lang (EN-US) /P 12 0 R /Parent 10 0 R >> Sharp, and the response of the United States. /K 6 << endobj >> /P 505 0 R /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 25 0 R Ins. /P 12 0 R /S /P >> endobj citation to the law supporting the request. /S /P I hereby certify that a true and correct copy of the United States' Response to Defendant's Motion to Disqualify Prosecutors Mark R. Rosman and Karen J. /CropBox [0 0 612 792] /Tabs /S PDF In the 242nd District Court of Swisher County, Texas PDF STATE OF CALIFORNIA GAVIN NEWSOM, Governor PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION /Lang (EN-US) 110 0 obj /S /Reference Frosh, Attorney General of Maryland, and Carrie J. Williams, Assistant Attorney General, pursuant to this Court's October 12, 2022 order, hereby responds to Mr. Syed's motion to disqualify the Office of the Attorney General as counsel for the State of Maryland or strike the State as a party to the appeal and states as follows: I. The instant motion was filed eleven days after all the testimony had been taken and five days after the judge had announced his ruling. The attorney appointed to represent Orioles owner Peter Angelos in his family's fight over his fortune has rejected a move to disqualify him from the case, calling allegations that he has . 30 0 obj All rights reserved. /P 12 0 R endobj /K 26 << /Annots [] >> 232 0 obj >> /S /TOCI /K 5 257 0 obj 141 0 obj /Tabs /S >> /Pg 16 0 R 0000009145 00000 n /K 10 >> /Lang (EN-US) /P 509 0 R /Pg 17 0 R << >> /K 9 << /K 10 /K [0 325 0 R 13] 41 0 obj /K 23 /P 509 0 R See, e.g., People v. Shari, 204 P.3d 453, 457 (Colo. 2009) (distinguishing between duties to current clients under Colo. RPC 1.7 and to former clients under Colo. RPC 1.9). Peters v. Dist. /Parent 11 0 R 314 0 obj /Annots [] 63 0 obj /S /P /Lang (EN-US) >> 122 0 obj >> Here, two FBI agents were present during the defendant's meeting with the prosecutors and are available to testify as to what took place during the meeting. /S /P endobj /Lang (EN-US) >> 125 0 obj 70 0 obj >> /A 499 0 R 282 0 R null 284 0 R 285 0 R 284 0 R null 286 0 R 287 0 R 286 0 R null >> /Parent 9 0 R /Pg 27 0 R /Rotate 0 /Lang (EN-US) /Pg 36 0 R >> /Resources 411 0 R << /P 12 0 R /K [8 510 0 R] /P 531 0 R /K 1 /Pg 32 0 R endobj /S /P /S /Reference Despite the Attorney General's best attempts to cast himself a super- << /Type /Pages >> /Lang (EN-US) /S /P >> >> << endobj /Lang (EN-US) 856 F. Supp. /Lang (EN-US)